When selecting the right setup for your organization, consider the following key questions:
Larger organizations with multiple independent product lines may benefit from separate design systems, while smaller teams may prefer a single system with structured brand layers.
If different teams or departments need distinct access levels, independent design systems might offer more flexibility in managing permissions.
A single design system allows for a unified documentation hub, while multiple design systems provide separate, dedicated websites for different product areas or brands.
Teams operating on different release cycles may require separate design systems to manage updates independently.
A centralized system streamlines collaboration, while separate design systems allow teams to work independently with their own governance structures.
A smaller team might find it easier to maintain a single design system, whereas larger teams with multiple contributors may need separate systems for better governance.
Are external vendors, brand designers, or contractors part of a different section? Are they contributing, or do they only need limited access to specific areas of the system?
To help you decide which setup best fits your organization, here’s a quick comparison of the key differences between the two multi-brand design system approaches in Supernova:
Your setup isn’t set in stone—many teams start with a single system and transition to multiple design systems as their needs evolve. You can begin with a core foundational Design System and scale into a multiple Design System approach as your organization grows.
By now, you should have a clearer vision of how to structure your multi-brand design system and which setup best fits your use case.
Now, let’s dive into the setup you’ve chosen and walk through how to get everything up and running!